I've got an appointment with an advisor on Monday.

I thought when the letter said "I enclose a copy of the decision" I thought it meant a copy of the decision I got from the tribunal in August where it said the appeal is disallowed (so i didn't bother to get round to looking at it - till now).

But infact it meant a copy of Septembers letter in the form of a decision notice where it says "The tribunal decision is not set aside"

But also the decision notice it says something for me to go on - it also says "This is because none of the conditions set out in Rule 37(2) is satisfied. There was no procedural irregularity"

Thanks, if after all the appeals etc don't work then i might try a new claim.

I got the letter a couple of weeks ago. I have in mind an advisor i've seen before face to face so i could see them again.

The letter i sent to them before that I put at the top of the letter as a single line paragraph that i request a statement of reasons.

Then in a paragraph under that i asked some questions i'd like answered in the SOR such as if the extra evidence i sent had been taken into consideration being that it got there the day before the tribunal.